Lead: July 23 evening, Hangzhou deep lines D301 and D3115 train rear-end train, derailment. However, so far, the 7.23 rear-end motor car is still cause of the accident such as dense fog. To this end, NetEase users organize the attention of the seven questions, hoping to get authoritative sources of clarification.
 |
7.23 Rear-end Motor Car Accident |
First, why not publish two train passenger list?
Official Disclosure: It is the Ministry of Railways official website news, at 21:00 on the 24th, the Ministry of Railways held the whole road transport safety emergency video conference. Meetings figures, 7.23 rear-end motor car accident has caused 36 deaths and 192 injuries.
Question: However, there are still some users of the microblogging questioned the death toll. For the Ministry of Railways, the best approach is timely publication of two train passenger list, to prepare for the media and the public verification (real-name system for ticket sales moving vehicles, public passenger list is not difficult).
Second, why the rush to bury damaged car?
Official Disclosure: According to People reported that the reason for the body for burial, said Wang Yongping, Ministry of Railways is not a decision that he is in the reach of Wenzhou, the only others to report that, when reporting to explain to do so The reason is, given the complexity of the scene and rescue the environment, under the viaduct is the mud, in order to facilitate the rescue, was compelled to do so. Wang Yongping said he believed this explanation.
Question: this, that someone questioned why not keep cars in order to identify cause of the accident, is not to cover up the evidence? Even the relics inside, family members should wait to claim, because how can rescue hastily buried?
 |
7.23 Rear-end Motor Car Accident |
Third, why should prematurely announced the end of the search and rescue work?
Official Disclosure: According to China Central Television news, at 20:50 on the 23rd, Wenzhou motor car rear-end accidents occurred within the present, search and rescue operations have ended, the staff are cutting body; According to People's Daily reported, 24 pm, officials announced no longer signs of life inside, to carry out dismantling of the body.
Question: But, to at 17:40 on the 24th or so, search and rescue personnel in the overhead compartment on the half-section search and rescue, we found a survivor's child. Ministry of Railways spokesman Wang Yongping was rescued at about a little girl, he said, this is the miracle of life. Since the search and rescue operation has ended, no longer signs of life inside, why is there a child alive? Lamented the miracle of life with, why not save time?
Fourth, the cause of the accident whether natural or man-made?
Official disclosure: For the 7.23 rear-end motor car cause of the accident, the media widely quoted a saying that "lightning strikes caused by equipment failure" caused. However, the Ministry of Railways spokesman Wang Yongping in the 24-day news conference, "according to the normal situation, the train's rear-end should not happen, but the cause of the accident is under investigation. The State Council has organized an accident investigation team will be seriously ground, seriously, carefully check out the cause of the accident. "
Question: what is the natural or man-made accident? In 2007, CCTV's "Focus" program was an interview with the Ministry of Railways chief engineer the #, when he said: China's motor car can not rear-end, which is China's sixth railway speed of a major innovation. Since the motor car technology is reliable, not rear-end, then the cause of the accident due to weather is wrong?
To this end, Zhejiang Provincial Party Committee Organization Department of the micro-Bo Cai Qi bluntly: "such a big accident, how can we blame the weather and technical factors? Who should the pay? Railway sector should be hard to draw profound lessons: Railway re- speed, but also safety first! injury can not afford life-ah! "
 |
7.23 Rear-end Motor Car Accident |
Five cause of the accident is not known why the rush to dismiss officials?
Official disclosure: July 24, the Ministry of Railways decided to party on the occurrence of 7.23 Yongwen major railway line in particular accidents Dragon Shanghai Railway Bureau Beijing party secretary Jia Li, in charge of public works deputy director He Shengli electric service to be removal, and investigation. Ministry of Railways spokesman Wang Yongping case explained, "Although the cause of the accident is still under investigation, but for whatever reason, the leaders are responsible, so the relevant officers dealing with."
Question: But there are still users questioned in the cause of the accident has not been investigated before, the railway sector already a number of the Shanghai Railway Bureau, responsible for the removal process, whether chopping car, leave it alone suspects? Since the leadership has the responsibility, why only recall mid-level leadership?
Sixth, the high-speed rail crash driver reliable?
Official disclosure: Vanguard, according to Daily Times column article entitled "" speed Pioneer "Li Dongxiao" (December 14, 2010 version 01) reported that, "Li Dongxiao, middle school, ordinary drivers, but China has created a high-speed rail many "firsts." he quizzed under China's High Speed Rail 0001 driver's license, out of China's first high-speed rail speed record ... world ... "
"March 16, 2008, Li Dongxiao other 10 Beijing Railway Bureau depot driver, was selected as the first high-speed rail drivers Republic, was ordered to China CNR Tangshan Railway Vehicle Company to learn to drive this point, Lidong Xiao and colleagues CRH3 type are made with high-speed motor vehicle has not been met, do not even know how many drivers console switch one more day debugging, you can give passengers a safe and comfortable. the higher level of "dead order": training for 10 days. 10 days later, the first column must be 350 km per hour EMU back to Beijing to open! "
"No two or three months time, you are open not go!" Guidance of German experts Maikesi training again and again shook his head, to learn from scratch, just 10 days to control the world's most advanced, most complex high-speed EMU, This is a mission impossible! The German experts also suggested that "you can return to Beijing. The safety point of view, this truck can make another locomotive to pull back." But according to People's Daily reported that Li Dongxiao really drove home 10 days.
Question: Executive Order High Speed Rail disqualification under examination can not the problem?
 |
7.23 Rear-end Motor Car Accident |
Seven high-speed rail driver fatigue, driving conditions there?
Official disclosure: July 24, Chinese Academy of Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University professor Wang Meng-shu financial new network in an interview that the surprise of such an accident, the driver error may be one cause of the accident. Wang Meng-shu also pointed out that the track driving professionals are very scarce, driver fatigue, driving occasionally occur.
Wang Meng-shu said, now they did not day and night to open, and sometimes can not guarantee a break. Former railway apartment has a special driver, the driver within the specified time to sleep, eat. But with the rail logistics system in the market, the gradual disappearance of these provisions. "A lot of bad drivers, reflecting the rest, we also reflected many times, but nobody."
Question: In this regard, the Ministry of Railways should be a clear response: there is no high-speed rail driver fatigue, driving conditions? If so, driver fatigue, driving, how can we ensure the safety of high-speed rail?
 |
7.23 Rear-end Motor Car Accident |
Conclusion: Only a comprehensive, timely and accurate disclosure of cause of the accident and progress, and thoroughly pursue the responsible person, in order to comfort the dead, to avoid another tragedy occurs. Only thus can we restore the reputation of the departments concerned, to avoid rumors.